Can AI Learn From Failures During a Project?
AI can use earlier failures during a project, but important lessons are not automatically permanent. We turn meaningful failures into project knowledge.
Read experimentBrowse the full Worthy Trying collection. Every article comes from a practical question, project result, failure, or lesson we believed deserved its own reader job.
AI can use earlier failures during a project, but important lessons are not automatically permanent. We turn meaningful failures into project knowledge.
Read experimentAI workflows become bloated one reasonable fix at a time. We learned how rules, validators and exceptions can create more work than they prevent.
Read experimentAI can produce one strong result, but maintaining the same standard across dozens of outputs is harder. Here's what helped us improve consistency.
Read experimentAI can produce fluent, confident explanations that are still wrong. We learned to separate plausibility from evidence and test important outputs.
Read experimentAI can often identify weaknesses in its own response when asked to critique it, but self-critique is not the same as independent verification.
Read experimentRepeated AI revisions can preserve bad assumptions and accumulated patches. Sometimes a clean restart from the corrected requirements is faster and better.
Read experimentAI can solve the requested problem while also changing nearby content, code, or visuals. Learn why it happens and how preservation constraints reduce the risk.
Read experimentOur AI workflow became slower as we added more checks and stages. Removing unnecessary machinery made the process faster and easier to trust.
Read experimentA screenshot can give AI valuable evidence about a broken website layout. We tested when visual debugging works and when the underlying code is still necessary.
Read experimentAI can help write building instructions, but buildability requires dimensions, materials, structure, fasteners and assembly steps to reconcile.
Read experimentWe tested generating AI images before writing the article. It improved alignment, but taught us that a shared specification matters more than production order.
Read experimentAI can generate a convincing object and then change its design in the next image. Here's what we learned about visual consistency across a series.
Read experimentAI can write smooth, professional prose that still fails the reader. We learned to separate writing quality from content value.
Read experimentWord count can reveal unusual content, but it cannot judge quality. We stopped using length targets and focused on whether the reader's need is complete.
Read experimentAI isn't automatically a time saver. Repeated corrections, validation and workflow maintenance can make automation cost more than it saves.
Read experimentAI can perform individual tasks remarkably well while long projects still drift. Here's why task execution and project management need different controls.
Read experimentLong AI projects can slowly move away from their original goal as corrections and experiments accumulate. We call this AI project drift.
Read experimentExamples can communicate qualities that are difficult to describe, but copying them too literally creates new problems. Here's how we use examples with AI.
Read experiment